When the Gavel Quivers: Ghana’s Chief Justice Suspended Amid Controversy

In an unexpected and unprecedented move, Ghana’s sitting President, John Dramani Mahama, on April 22, 2025, suspended Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Torkornoo. The announcement shook not only the nation’s legal fraternity but also sparked intense debate across political, civil, and international circles.

To some, it was the wheels of accountability turning in real time. To others, it echoed a political witch hunt cloaked in constitutional process. But beyond the headlines lies a complex intersection of law, power, procedure—and the ever-elusive search for justice in Africa.

The Suspension: What Happened?

The President’s decision followed the submission of three separate petitions alleging misconduct and incompetence on the part of the Chief Justice. Upon consultation with Ghana’s Council of State, a prima facie case was established. In accordance with Article 146 of Ghana’s Constitution, a five-member investigative committee has now been set up to delve deeper into the matter.

While the full content of the petitions has not been made public, earlier reports suggest one of them may trace back to a December 2024 petition by legal scholar Professor Kwaku Asare, alleging improper administrative conduct—such as bypassing the Judicial Council on Supreme Court appointments and interfering with judicial panels. That petition was previously dismissed by former President Nana Akufo-Addo due to procedural lapses.

This time, however, the tide has turned.

Legal Grounds vs Political Undertones

From a legal standpoint, the president’s action is constitutional. Article 146 provides a clear path for investigating alleged misconduct by high-ranking judicial officers. But legality alone doesn’t erase public suspicion—especially in a region where political influence has often infiltrated the sanctity of the bench.

Many legal observers, including members of the Ghana Bar Association and civil society, are urging caution. “Yes, we must hold every public official accountable, even the Chief Justice,” said one senior legal practitioner in Accra. “But we must equally be wary of the dangerous precedent where judicial independence becomes vulnerable to executive interference.”

For others, the concern lies in timing. Why now? Why under this administration? And what might this mean for the fragile balance of power in Ghana’s democracy?

The Human Toll: Trust and Turmoil

Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo is more than just a name on a suspension notice. She is the first female Chief Justice appointed in over a decade and has been a trailblazer in digital justice reform, court automation, and judicial transparency.

To her supporters, this is not just about her job—it’s about what she represents: the elevation of women in law, the modernization of the judiciary, and a symbol of Ghana’s democratic evolution.

Now, her legacy hangs in limbo. So too does the public’s trust in a judicial system already battling perceptions of corruption and elitism.

Regional Reverberations: What Africa Should Learn

This is not just Ghana’s moment; it is Africa’s lesson. Across the continent, the judiciary remains both the last hope of the oppressed and a frequent casualty of political maneuvering.

What safeguards exist to protect judicial independence while promoting accountability? How can we balance transparency with discretion? And perhaps most crucially: who watches the watchers?

Ghana’s unfolding story is a cautionary tale. It reminds us that constitutionalism must be more than the ticking of legal boxes. It must be rooted in integrity, impartiality, and the protection of institutions—not personalities.

Looking Ahead: What Comes Next?

The investigative committee will determine whether the Chief Justice returns to office or is formally removed. Until then, Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie, the most senior judge on the Supreme Court, will serve as Acting Chief Justice.

But the larger questions remain: Will this process restore or erode public confidence in the judiciary? And will it set a precedent for how future legal disputes involving powerful figures are handled?

For Legal Africa readers, this is more than news. It’s a living case study—one that reveals both the power and the peril of legal authority in the African context.

Conclusion

In Ghana today, the gavel quivers—but it has not yet fallen. Justice must not only be done; it must be seen to be done. And in this moment, the eyes of a continent are watching.

DON’T MISS THIS : The Scales Must First Weigh: Due Process in the Removal of a Chief Justice in Ghana